MAKE THE LAST LINE OF DEFENSE YOUR FIRST PRIORITY

The best defense is the one that will be there when a threat manifests. Armed, trained, and vetted employees working as a coordinated team and circulating throughout the enterprise provide the best defense. With DSI Enterprise Offerings you can recruit and deploy a private security force for a fraction of the cost of outsourced options while maintaining total control over this most vital strength.

What Happens When The Once Esteemed Bible Of Free Enterprise Sends A Freelance Journalist Covering “Resistance, Gender, And Politics” To Report On Guns In Schools?

Bill Tallen, Executive Vice-President of Distributed Security, Inc. responds to Erin Corbett‘s article on Fortune.com, Kids Brought Guns to School at Least 392 Times Last Year. Here’s What Experts Say We Should Do About It 10/23/19

This article is just more antigun “advocacy journalism,” distorting and cherry-picking useful research on firearms violence in schools, and relying heavily on unsubstantiated opinion from sources with little professional credibility.

The heartstring-grabbing title establishes both the tone, and the fast and loose treatment of facts and logic.  In the first week of the 2019 academic year, we are told, guns were found in students’ backpacks in Arizona, California, Indiana and Massachusetts. Now, perhaps we should celebrate these discoveries, because none of them ended in violence.  But that’s not the point, you see, which is the need for a “nationally enforced reporting system” and “Child Access Prevention” laws at the federal level. Never mind that 27 states plus D.C. already have such laws – including three of the four states mentioned, which suggests what we already know, that laws on the books don’t force behavior consistently enough to justify yet another federal encroachment on states’ responsibility for criminal law.

Did I mention cherry-picking?  The article cites one fact from the voluminous National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) study, Indicators of School Crime and Safety. That critical factoid is that during the 2016-2017 school year, there were 3,272 instances across America where “kids brought guns to school.”  In round numbers, there are about 33 million elementary school students in the U.S.  If there are on average 150 school days in the year, that suggests 4,950,000,000 (that’s almost five billion) opportunities for kids to sneak a gun into their school, so forgive me if I find 3,272 instances, less than 1/100,000 of the opportunities, not a happy number but somewhat less than apocalyptic. I really prefer the NCES approach, which speaks of rates and percentages; it’s easy to forget what a big country this is, and be misled by numbers.

The NCES study is a good piece of work that presents several things shedding light on the broader topic of violence in schools. For instance, the federally promoted Youth Risk Behavior Survey asked if 9th-12th grade students had carried a weapon “such as a gun, knife, or club” anywhere in the last 30 days, and whether they had carried such a weapon on school property.  16% reported that had carried some such weapon at least one day, a rate unchanged since 2001; but only 4% reported they had done so on school property, down from 6% in 2001. Of course, there was no differentiation between those three types of weapons (so the numbers tell us nothing about the rate of firearms carry), or the circumstances (for instance were the “weapons” associated with hunting, sport competition, adult supervised activities, or other non-threatening contexts, or were they pizza slices nibble into the shape of a gun?). It is also worth remembering that these are anonymous survey responses by teenagers.

But that doesn’t help the narrative, so we move right along. We’ll be back to the NCES report in a bit, but first, let’s consult some “advocates”. The “guns brought to school” numbers, if they didn’t scare you enough, must be only the tip of the iceberg because “we don’t know how pervasive the problem is,” according to one “Gun Violence Prevention Advocate” (capitals in the original), and “public schools aren’t properly reporting the incidents” because there is no “nationally enforced reporting system,” according to (who else?) “experts.”

The author moves on to “gun storage laws” and the opinion of another gun policy “expert” who tells us that “everyone is focused on the rights they have, but not the responsibility.” But don’t worry, experts (again) tell us that that “the conversation doesn’t have to be so politically polarized” like, you know, generalizing about the irresponsibility of everyone who favors firearms rights.

Sticks and stones might break your bones, but if words don’t scare you sufficiently, maybe some graphics will do the trick. In that spirit, we are given a map of the US generated from “news reports compiled by Fortune,” splattered with dots of various sizes indicating the number of incidents of kids bringing firearms to schools in the 2018-2019 school year, aggregated by counties.  Lots of open areas on this map, and lots of the little “one incident” dots, but a metastasizing cancer of swelling, overlapping circles (the 12-incident circle has an area about 804 times larger than the 1-incident dot) covering the left and right coasts and a scattering of counties across the South and Midwest.  The counties picked out for having 5-12 of these incidents are almost all (all but one) in states that – referencing sources cited in this article itself – already have laws in place establishing criminal penalties for allowing minors unsupervised access to firearms, under various conditions. Is anybody unfamiliar with – or impressed by – the point of view that if existing laws are ineffective, the obvious solution is to pass more laws?  But sources like the Giffords Law Center (notoriously anti-firearm) insist that federal law will sort this out: all we need is a federal Child Access Prevention Law that will hold parents responsible – those deplorably irresponsible gun-owning parents, you see, at least those not already disarmed by a federal “red flag law.”

Never mind, though, just keep moving: “Gun violence prevention experts” (unnamed but who are we to question?) agree that the biggest reason that kids are taking guns into their schools – remember these incidents overwhelmingly do not result in violence – is “because they have access to them in the first place.”  Well, that seems logical; but why doesn’t the author share a very interesting discussion from the NCES study, which reports that minors’ access to loaded guns without adult permission actually decreased from 7% to 3% between 2007 and 2017?  Could it be that this crisis – a crisis of potential, because there isn’t any correlation offered between all these guns coming to school and actual shootings – is actually waning without big government intervention?  That would be inconvenient and off-message.

In case any of you deplorable, violent troglodytes have missed the message, this article then characterizes the arming of teachers, or provision of armed police or school resource officers (SROs) to schools as “reactionary” responses. Watch out; we know what happens to reactionaries.  But maybe some of you can be brought over to the right (left?) side, when you learn that “studies show those efforts don’t actually make anyone safer.”  I jumped right onto that link to peruse those groundbreaking studies, but the link leads to just one study, which is actually ambivalent about SROs. As it should be, because while there have been some high-profile failures (such as Parkland) SROs have saved lives on several occasions.  Properly selected, trained, and supported, they contribute significantly to the security of schools against armed threats, as do armed staff members (never just “teachers”) in the 20-plus states that have them. Of course, that one study doesn’t even mention armed staff members; I guess that idea is just so reactionary that we don’t need no stinkin’ study to tell us so. 

But we don’t get to contemplate armed school staff and their merits, because we need to hear from more “community organizers,” “Social Work” academics, student activists, and – of course – Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety.  Not one of whom, I confidently predict, will ever be on hand when the shooting starts in a school, and the soon-to-be victims look around desperately for a defender to stand between them and maiming or death.

No one who supports armed protection in our schools believes that is the only way to address the threat of school violence – which in a rare moment of clarity and honesty, this article does admit is “incredibly rare.”  But it is a last line of defense when all the unenforced laws and hopeful prevention, detection, and access denial measures fail – as they do, by definition, every time an active killer opens up. 

We’re Distributed Security, Inc., and we’re experts in armed security and the defense of innocent life by trained, motivated civilians.  You want to know what “the experts say we should do about it?”  We’re the experts who can tell you what will happen on that bad day if you have armed, trained personnel in your child’s school – and what will happen if you don’t.

Bill Tallen is Executive Vice President – Tactical Operations.Prior to joining the enterprise he had a 20 year career with the Department of Energy, where he served as a Federal Agent, team leader, unit commander, training instructor, and manager in the agency which provides secure transportation of nuclear weapons and nuclear materials within CONUS. He helped to found DOE’s Special Response Force program, developing and teaching urban and close quarter battle techniques to Federal Agents charged with recovery of lost assets. He has designed and conducted a variety of wargaming efforts in support of vulnerability assessments, security system design, and leadership training, and has taught a variety of crisis decision making models. Bill holds the degree of Master of Arts in National Security and Strategic Studies from the U.S. Naval War College.

What should Walmart really do about mass shootings?

Walmart needs to do the following in order to respond to active shooters:

  1. Develop a select cadre of highly-trained, armed, and wired employees to eliminate an active shooter.
  2. Build a shooting range into every store. Use the range to train employees and sell range time to customers.
  3. Extend their security cadre and training to other retailers in their immediate vicinity.

DSI’s Enterprise Offerings were created to do this. For more information:

Enterprise Offerings:
https://distributedsecurity.com/start-here/defended-enterprise.html

Distributed Security Networks:
https://distributedsecurity.com/offerings/private-defense-networks.html

Debunking the Notion that only Former Military and Law Enforcement Officers can Defend against Active Shooters.

See the source image

On 5 AUG 19, in the wake of the El Paso and Dayton active shooter events, Sean Hannity recommended a volunteer initiative of former military and law enforcement officers deployed to schools and other vulnerable public areas to defend against future violent threats.

While that thinking is a step forward on the conventional thought spectrum, the team at Distributed Security, Inc (DSI) is actively training school staff and other civilians for the necessary and immediate response to threats in the critical gap between the onset of an attack and effective intervention by police.

We want to correct the fallacy that only law enforcement or ex-military can perform this task. As trainers, who have trained the highest level military, contracting and law enforcement, we can definitively state that private citizens can be trained to be safe and effective defenders of business, school, church and community. In fact, in most cases, private citizens who go through our training are better prepared to deal with an active threat than most police and military veterans. Any smart, fit, dedicated citizen can be trained to the necessary standard for the defense of innocent life. Prior military or law enforcement experience is not a requirement, and is not a guarantee of success.

In a world that is increasingly fractured and unpredictable, DSI draws heavily from the strategic ideas of William Lind’s 4th Generation Warfare theory and the OODA Loop methodology of John Boyd in our efforts to assist individuals, communities, enterprises, churches, and schools defend themselves in the event of violent threat.

In short, we begin training where many other organizations leave off. And, we train our clients to best practice, SWAT-level proficiencies in handgun, rifle, shotgun, tactical communications and tactical medicine. Our offerings are tactical and holistic. And, we actively engage and manage the necessary consistent, follow-on training beyond initial certification.

We do not believe that having had training at some point in the past is enough. Simply possessing a prior military or law enforcement credential does not keep one sharp. Threats evolve, tactics develop, and technologies advance after one leaves the training and operational world. The active shooter environment is a dynamic and asymmetric one, and those who would respond should have the benefit of appropriately dynamic and asymmetric training to meet the challenge.

In all, the most effective public safety strategy is for community organizations to insource their security capabilities as “quick reaction force” to manage emerging threats, real time. There is certainly a law enforcement role in an active shooter scenario, but as Hannity noted in his monologue, the police cannot be in all places at all times.

We commend Mr Hannity for his forward thinking comments and for raising awareness that there is a better way. Meanwhile, Distributed Security, Inc has developed and is executing a plan that exceeds his suggestion in breadth, depth, and effectiveness.

Buy a gun. Get trained.

A Bridge Too Far…?

When I was a younger man, still in the Army, I had the opportunity to participate in the annual Nijmegen March. Nijmegen happens as a commemoration of the US’s role liberating the Netherlands in World War 2’s Operation Market Garden and was immortalized in the movie “A Bridge Too Far”.

The annual event is a 100 mile march (25 miles a day) in and around the town of Nijmegen, Holland. Troops are invited from around the world to participate, but the vast majority of marchers are from US Army units.

Each morning, around 4 am, our team would get up, ruck-up, and begin the daily walk. We’d finish and get back to our sleeping accommodations late morning, shower, sleep for a couple hours, and then we’d hit the town to party with the locals until, 1 or 2 am, ready to rinse and repeat.

Each morning, the roads we marched were lined with locals. Predominantly, young women. And, they would cheer and make a hell of a spectacle of themselves. Throwing flowers, paper slips with phone numbers and addresses, and various pieces of clothing at the American Paratroopers. You see… we had a reputation. While Operation Market Garden was not a complete success, the Nijmegen operation was. We were the direct descendants of those paratroopers from WWII who had walked in, smacked the Nazis in the mouth, rescued the damsel in distress… and, bedded her.

We were Kings. We were Rockstars. We were Men among men. And, we were desired.

Around the world, many American men had that sort of reputation and aura about them at one time. Not so much any more.

I’m looking for a word… Bland. No. Vanilla… mmmm… Ice Cream… Milquetoast? Too British. Neutered? Close…

Eunuch. That’s the word I’m looking for. Eunuch.

Eunuch: noun

a castrated man, especially one formerly employed by rulers in the Middle East and Asia as a harem guard or palace official.

Why am I kicking this word around? Because, the vast majority of supposed 2nd Amendment “advocates” I speak to (you know… the guys who talk about being citizens as opposed to subjects) seem to be Eunuchs. Every one of them seems to have had his daddy-tackle removed.

Sure, there’s lots of tough talk. There are promises that eventually “We” (you know, the royal we) are going to cross some notional Rubicon regarding our rights and these nutless wonders are going to spring into action, locked and loaded. But… are they? Really?

Because, entire revolutions have occurred, blood in the streets, kings toppled, governments converted, borders changed, for far less than the infringements we’re currently watching occur before our very eyes. And, when you start to talk nuts and bolts with the 2A crowd, when you really start to press them about the plan, or the training, or where that line in the sand really is… it all falls apart. We’ll just rely on voting the bastards out and pay lobbyists to tell the gov’t that we’re really upset.

In a country with a God given, Constitutionally affirmed right to arms (the 2nd Amendment for the new guys), we rely on the lobbyists, lawyers, and politicians to do what men should be doing. There are a number of implications in that last sentence, and I want you to consider all of them.

By delegating our responsibility to actively preserve our rights, we are abdicating them. It is not necessary, and certainly not desirable, to lobby (i.e. beg) for our rights to be observed, honored, and respected by the Crown. They are not the Crown’s to give, much less to take away. The rightful remedy to government over-reach is to exercise our rights, forcefully if necessary. Not to grovel and whine.

Why is it, then, in the United States of America, a country founded on the premise that Citizens possess the right to be armed and to be able to respond violently if a government were to attempt to deprive them of that right… Why is it, that we are actively losing the 2A war? Why is there a battle? Why even a debate?

Because we American (formerly) men, have traded our balls and guns for loafers and ballots. Because we’ve decided that lawyers should do the heavy lifting. Because all that training and preparing shit is hard and expensive. Because we’ve convinced ourselves that being “civilized” and soft is a good thing. Because, American men act like neutered, flaccid house cats. We act like eunuchs. As a culture, we are kept men.

Rights, particularly gun rights are maintained by unapologetically training and exercising those rights. Lobbying for them is the equivalent of sitting in a drum circle, contemplating our collective navel, and hoping for the best.

We don’t lack for good, historic role models. We American men were pioneers, mountain men, gunslingers, and war heroes. Now, we won’t even exercise our own rights, seemingly for fear of breaking a nail or offending some blue haired, female soccer player.

See the source image

How’s that going for you? And, what are you willing to do about it? What’s your birthright? When will we reach our “Bridge too Far”?

Reach out. I can help.

Of Tribes, Transitions, Voids, and Resurrection

See the source image

I’m a veteran. More specifically, I am a US Army, Light Infantry veteran.

As a grunt, I was surrounded by like-minded individuals who were working as a team toward a goal with a “higher purpose”. Now, in retrospect, I have some doubts about the means, methods, and righteousness of that goal, but I cannot ever doubt the commitment and cohesion of my peers or the merits of service to something bigger than myself.

My various units and the relationships within them were indescribably tribal. We were much more than “co-workers”. We were family. Moreover, we were family who understood that we may have to die for one another on a foreign battlefield, in a fight we didn’t start, at the direction of faceless bureaucrats, in service to a country we all loved. That is a bond that is not replicate-able outside an infantry environment.

When I decided to leave the Army, I had lots of good reasons to do so. And, those reasons still stand today. However, what I could not have predicted was the void left by not having my tribe at my shoulder, going forward. And, it was unrecognizable for a good long time. In fact, I have only very recently identified it for what it was and is.

That void is tangible. It acts on each of us in different ways I imagine, but it’s there for each of us. I suspect that it is what drives the veteran suicide statistics. I suspect that, if one were to be diagnosed, it would be identified psychologically as a sort of depression. It doesn’t render any of us dysfunctional, but it renders us less than whole. And in a way that is impossible to adequately describe to those who haven’t experienced it.

My own personal journey has been marked by any number of attempts to fill that unnamed void. From immersing myself in family, to attending college, to working in various fields that held some interest for me, to pursuing high level management positions and business ownership in order to recreate some meaning in my life. The end result has been that, I have professionally, wandered aimlessly for 20 years. And, again, until very recently, I couldn’t identify the feeling or where it was coming from.

There is a deep satisfaction in being involved with a tribe that has a mission bigger than the individual and the team. There is a deep satisfaction in fighting the “good fight” against all odds. There is something empowering about a situation where it is just you and your tribe against the world. And, my experience to date is that, it is very difficult to achieve that state of satisfaction away from your tribe and in the civilian/corporate world.

The problem is, I think, that for fighters, warriors, soldiers, etc, the civilian world is a shallow and superficial place. It is completely alien to our programming and wiring. The psychology is different, the goals are different, and the outcomes are not vital. Winning and losing boils down to getting paid and cashing the check every other week.

Contemporary civilian life exists in a world of paychecks, balance sheets, sitcoms, and politics. That’s where it seems to begin and end. There is no higher purpose to be found there. No brotherhood. At the end of the day, no matter if it was a good day or a bad day, everyone goes home. At the end of the day, there are no life or death consequences to being good or bad at your job. There is no need to survive. Civility is the realm of the soft and corrupt. And, for the former soldier, there is no place that feels like home.

This is why the idea of “transition” from the military is a myth. It does not exist.

Now, I say that with no malice. It isn’t anybody’s fault. But, it is the reality. Former service members, particularly triggerpullers, are aliens in the civilian world. They are left missionless, alone, and burdened with rules that have no merit.

When you are “transitioning” from the military, it is commonplace for the resume writers to try to highlight “leadership experience”. Which is great… and appropriate, but one’s military leadership experience is irrelevant on the other side of the wire. I have been asked more times than I can count to institute and apply “military-style leadership principles” in companies I have worked for. And, each and every time was a dismal failure. Because, those who need to be led are incapable of it and company ownership has no idea what they’re asking for. Moreover, in a feelings-based, emotion driven, civilian economy, that ownership has no tolerance for the waves that “military leadership” creates.

And, so, veterans are left aimless to wander the civilian wilderness. Strangers in a strange land. By the time they find out how separation from their tribe will affect them, it’s too late. Our purpose has been stripped of us and the search for new purpose is lengthy and difficult… and for some, an impossible quest.

So, what to do? The “yearbook” answer is, “use your GI Bill, go to college”. Been there. Talk about agonizing. If you want to feel alienated, just attend college as a veteran. I could go on, but I won’t. I’ll simply tell you that, for me, college was an exercise in absurdity.

Working for others doesn’t typically mesh because, in order to be happy doing that, you have to respect your employer. And, frankly, most employers don’t have the prerequisite experience necessary to inspire respect from a veteran who’s spent any time downrange. Additionally, the employer has to respect the veteran. And, they can’t because they lack the frame of reference to do so.

So… the option is to work for yourself. Right? Maybe. That’s a minefield all it’s own. Because, the reality is that the economy is set up to reward one of three things; creation, sales, or labor. Creating a product or service OR assembling or selling someone else’s product or service. Without getting into the relative merits of creation and sales, the reality is that there is little inspiring or “higher calling” about either of those endeavors for warriors. And, that inspiration to a higher calling is what the veteran seeks. The only inspiration and satisfaction that I have found is finding that thing that meshes with what I enjoy, am good at, and where I deal with little interference from ‘higher’..

So, what is it that former triggerpullers are good at? Well… shooting and teaching others to shoot. All that being true, it’s important to approach that vocation and marketplace with eyes wide open.

It’s become a reality that the “tactical” market is somewhat saturated. And, it’s more saturated with know-nothing clowns than it is with real-deal, former action guys. So, if that’s the path you want to go down, and you recognize that the market is saturated… how does the prospective entrepreneur set themselves apart in that marketplace?

You have to start with a plan. Not a gimmick-y, hyped plan. A real plan, with a real foundation, based in real knowledge and skills. If you want to build a solid business that will serve you and your market for a long time, it is not enough to simply hang your veteran credentials on a shingle and open shop. You’re going to need a curriculum, a business plan, marketing materials, teaching chops, and the desire and ability to talk to people. And, that is where I think I can assist.

In my own personal search, I finally found Distributed Security, Inc (DSI). A company of former military personnel, contractors, and businessmen with a desire to improve their communities and country with Combative Firearms training offerings for individuals, enterprises, faith-based organizations, educational institutions, and healthcare facilities.

The business model satisfied my higher-calling needs, the proof-of-concept has been established in recent years in Iraq and Afghanistan, there was an established curriculum that had more merit than I have seen elsewhere in the firearms training community, and I could work for myself and with guys who had a common background and understood where I was coming from. Jackpot.

As a part of my involvement with DSI, we have introduced the Defender 300 Program (D300). Through which, a veteran who wanted to embark on the path of self-employment in the firearms training industry could carve out his place. Along with the benefits of commission based sales of DSI products and reduced personal training costs, that veteran can (and is encouraged to) certify as a Combative Firearms Instructor. After which, he may become an independent instructor or prospective DSI franchisee.

Based on my particular perspective, and head full of questionable wiring, this is a no-brainer kind of choice. If you are a vet, enjoy shooting and training, and are looking for a higher-calling career that taps into your skillset, I think you owe it to yourself to check out the D300.

Join the Tribe. Be a Warrior Capitalist. Fill the Void. Recreate yourself.

Get in touch. I can help.

Virginia Beach shooting victim considered taking gun to work over concerns about colleague…

One of the more tragic consequences over the past several active “shooter” events, has been the unnecessary sacrifice of individuals who with the proper training, could have put down the threat.

Now we learn that Kate Nixon, one of the Virginia Beach victims indicated the night before she was slaughtered by DeWayne Craddock:

The public utilities engineer was concerned about DeWayne Craddock “as well as one other person,” said Kevin Martingayle, an attorney working with Nixon’s family. So on the night of May 30, Nixon had discussed with her husband, Jason, “whether or not she should take a pistol and hide it in her handbag,” Martingayle said. She decided against it because of a city policy that prevents employees from bringing weapons to work.

If your security plan does not include highly-trained, armed, and wired employees then the slaughter will continue. How much are you willing to pay for that ticket to the security theater? How many lives are you willing to sacrifice in order to appease the gun-controller?

https://pilotonline.com/news/local/virginia-beach-mass-shooting/article_3843db5c-8b9e-11e9-b87f-e3e87b2a3b42.html

We can develop six highly-trained, armed, and wired employees for the same cost as a single contract security guard.

Contract security giant Securitas released their biennial survey and were surprised to find out that “active shooters and company insiders”, were the biggest physical threats facing corporate America today according to the surveyed corporate security managers.

The only way to effectively defend against an active shooter is with a cadre of highly-trained and armed employees who will be there at the moment of contact. Anything else is security theater.

Distributed Security, Inc. can train enterprise employees* to defend against violent attack.  Our program integrates 56 hours of training over 3 months – 16 hours of dedicated range training with 24 hours of reality based training – and includes tactical medical training. Our training develops combative firearms skills and focuses on the use of concealment and cover, working hallways, stairs and doorways, crossing thresholds and clearing rooms.

For details on our enterprise training programs click here:
https://distributedsecurity.com/start-here/businesses,-churches-and-schools.html

*This program is for non-security personnel who continue to work their existing job after training.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Bans Police From Taking “Warrior” Style Training… Whatever the hell that is…

No “Warrior”-training. Derp.

In a political and economic environment where Law Enforcement training funds are in short supply, the Minneapolis Police Dept has banned, what they are calling, “Warrior”-style training. Officers are now prohibited from partaking of such training on their own time and dime. I don’t know, exactly, how Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey is defining “Warrior” training but, I have a couple ideas.

In an April 19, 2019 press conference, Frey pressed all the emotional hot-buttons by using terminology like “fear-based” training, “warrior-style”, and “Killology” (a theory popularized by LTC (Ret) Dave Grossman). Further, he went on to say that, “Fear-based trainings violate the values at the very heart of community policing. When you’re conditioned to believe that every person encountered poses a threat to your existence, you simply cannot be expected to build meaningful relationships with those same people.”

Very nice, Mr Mayor. You have mastered pandering and anti-intellectual, political posturing. And, at the same time emphasized an “us vs them” attitude between your police and the citizenry.

Minneapolis (and it’s sister, St Paul) is a town where violent crime is on the rise, traditional demographics are being noticeably shifted, and Law Enforcement training funds are slim. Under those circumstances, I don’t think it’s unreasonable for Police Officers to feel like they may need a training edge. Be it in terms of physical/technical skills or psychological preparation for worst case scenarios. Further, the fact that some officers take it upon themselves to seek such advantage, outside the bureaucracy, displays admirable initiative.

As I see it, Police Depts are being increasingly tasked with what are arguably tactical, “paramilitary” roles as opposed to the romanticized (possibly antiquated) version of community policing. And, when you start to cross that line, the psychology has to change.

So, in essence, the mayor can’t have it both ways. None of us live in Mayberry, USA any longer, and politics are amplifying the shift away from that piece of Americana. And, since he created his narrative using words, for the most part, that aren’t defined, let’s look at the one specific example he cited. “Killology”.

“Killology”, as mentioned above, is a theory and field of study invented by LTC (Ret) Dave Grossman. Per Grossman, Killology “is the study of the psychological and physiological effects of killing and combat on the human psyche; and the factors that enable and restrain a combatant’s killing of others in these situations.” The theory was introduced in Grossman’s 1996 book, “On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society”.

The problem (yes, I said problem and didn’t sugarcoat the term for modern, politically-correct readers who prefer the use of the word “challenge”) is that Grossman’s writings are focused on “combatants”. Traditionally known as “soldiers”. Not, police specifically. However, due to the evolving nature and paramilitarization of police work… we are asking our police to engage in situations where that sort of mindset can be necessary. And, in my opinion, the circumstances driving those evolving and overlapping professional scopes is (drumroll, please), politics. Further politicizing the problem is not the answer. Einstein’s old mantra comes to mind…

Uh… Yup. If you do what you’ve always done, you’ll get what you’ve always got.

No matter how you feel about it, the face of “America” is changing. And, not for the better. There is a cultural assault being mounted on what, only 15 or 20 years ago, would have been considered normalcy. And, that assault is increasingly violent and in some cases, borderline military. So, to cling to Rules of Engagement from a time and situation past, while politically promoting and amplifying change and “progress, is a non-starter.

I don’t like, at all, that police are being forced into a militarized situation and mindset. I think it’s unhealthy. For the police and their communities. In that, I agree with the Mayor. He and I part ways on the practical reality of the thing.

To my mind, the answer isn’t telling police officers what training they can and cannot partake of on their own time and with their own money. The answer is to stop promoting the cultural changes that necessitate a militarized response (and a need to survive), stop creating a divide between your constituents and your police depts, and fund police training they need to do the job we’re asking them to do in the way we’re asking them to do it.

And, maybe that training balance is achieved by educating the Administrators and Bureaucrats (those who hold the purse strings) about the training options offered by professional companies, like Distributed Security, Inc and not simply leaving our police officers to be consumers of (at best) battlefield psychology training and (at worst) the former-knucklegdragger, “Bro culture” training industry.

Shut up and train.

DEFEND YOUR COMMUNITY FROM VIOLENT THREAT – Active Shooter. Terrorism. Gangs. Mobs. Antifa. Become a Defender 300.

Today we launched Defender 300, an elite group of highly-experienced gun owners defending their communities from violent threat.

Defender 300s (D300s) are trained and commissioned representatives, certified to present Distributed Security, Inc. offerings within their local communities. Prior military service or law enforcement experience is desired. There is a rigorous application process and 20 hours of on-line training and testing required to become a D300.  As a certified representative, the D300 is compensated via a sales commission for business that results from their representation.

Defender 300s receive:

1. Commission off the sale of DSI enterprise services.

2. 33% discount off of DSI Combative Firearms (T4), Individual Tactics (T3), Tactical Medical, and Tactical Communications training programs.

3. Access to all on-line Defense Academy content – manuals, videos, courses, training plans, etc.

4. Opportunity to qualify as a DSI certified instructor.

The D300 program requires dedication and commitment. We do not require any sort of an upfront payment from our D300 candidates or those who eventually certify.

The next D300 class kicks off July 1, 2019.

Visit www.distributedsecurity.com/defender-300-program for details on becoming a Defender 300 and to start the application process.

Marc Benioff And Salesforce.com Are Booting AR-15 And Handgun Sellers From Their Platforms.

Marc Benioff’s ban includes “any semiautomatic firearms that have the capacity to accept a detachable magazine” which basically bans all handgun sellers too. I’m actually ok with Benioff doing this. First, it further exposes him as a hypocritical twinkie (hey Marc, going to ban your security detail from carrying AR’s and Glocks?), and, second, this is a huge opening for real Americans to develop competing platforms. Get to work America!

Business-software giant Salesforce instituted a new policy barring its retail customers from selling semiautomatic weapons and some other firearms.

Source: Tech giant brings software to a gun fight

“What we’re looking at now is probably the greatest domestic espionage ring since the Roosevelt-Truman era.”

Thread by @corpseinarmor: “What we’re looking at now is probably the greatest domestic espionage ring since the Roosevelt-Truman era. This ti are probably five equal to an Alger Hiss. With deep penetration throughout DC establishment and natsec agenc […]”

Source: Thread by @corpseinarmor: “What we’re looking at now is probably the greatest domestic espionage ring since the Roosevelt-Truman era. This time, though, there are prob […]”

Escalating Workplace Violence Rocks Hospitals

“An officer inspects all bags and then instructs you to walk through the metal detector. In some cases, a metal wand is used — even on patients who come in on stretchers. Cleveland Clinic officials say they confiscate thousands of weapons like knives, pepper spray and guns each year. The metal detectors were installed in response to what CEO Tom Mihaljevic calls an epidemic.”

Has West Point turned in to just another Ivy League cesspool of political correctness? 

Diversity has nothing to do with competency. They better be the best and the brightest. Otherwise West Point has turned in to just another Ivy League cesspool of political correctness.

The graduates include the highest number of African-American women, as well as the most women to graduate for any class since 1980.

 

Source: Mike Pence at West Point commencement: Praises for Trump, graduates’ diversity

Make sure to subscribe to our Twitter feed for daily updates.

UA-56674165-2